National Chung Cheng University, China (Taiwan)
Vol.6 No.1 (Serial No.8) 2018
139-150
2018-06-30
The study reports the L2 acquisition of English reflexives and pronouns between native English speakers and adult Chinese speakers of L2 English. It is found that Chinese pronouns are quite similar with English, and Chinese and English pronouns can be either long-distantly binding or referred to others except for the local domain in complex sentences. However, Chinese reflexives are not the same as English reflexives. Chinese reflexives have two types, monomorphemic ziji and polymorphemic ta ziji, and one of the goals on the study is to test whether Chinese speakers of L2 English will domain the local binding in the complex sentences of English reflexives himself/herself. Finally, the results of the interpretation of English pronouns and reflexives show that L1 transfer cannot totally account for the interpretation of sentences. Two theories thus called Full Transfer/Full Access (Schwartz & Sprouse, 1994; 1996) and Partial Access (Tsimpli & Roussou, 1991) probably can account for the results of the present study.
Binding Principles, pronouns, reflexives, language transfer, second language acquisition
doi: 10.26478/ja2018.6.8.9
Allan, D. 1992. The Oxford Placement Test [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Balogh, J. E. 2003. Pronouns, prosody, and the discourse anaphora weighting approach [D]. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 3112198).
Carter, R. & McCarthy, M. 2006. Cambridge Grammar of English: A Comprehensive Guide Spoken and Written English Grammar and Usage [M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding [M]. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Hawkins, R. & Chan, Y. H. 1997. The Partial Availability of Universal Grammar in Second Language Acquisition: The ‘Failed Functional Features Hypothesis’ [J]. Second Language Research 13:187-226.
Hill, R. A. & Fenn, S. 1989. The Anglo-World and university of Edinburgh Proficiency Test Project [R]. Paper presented at the 23rd IATEFL International Conference, Warwick University, Warwick, United Kingdom.
Huang, C. T., Li, A. & Li, Y. 2009. The Syntax of Chinese [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Li, C. N. & Thompson, S. A. 1989. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar [M]. California: University of California Press.
Kong, S. 2005. The Partial Access of Universal Grammar in Second Language Acquisition: An Investigation of the Acquisition of English Subjects by L1 Chinese Speakers [J]. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 14:227-265.
Kong, S. 2009. The Interpretation of Chinese Monomorphemic and Polymorphemic Anaphors by Adult English Speakers [J]. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics 12:45-62.
Schwartz, B. D. 1994. Word Order and Nominative Case in Nonnative Language Acquisition: A Longitudinal Study of (L1 Turkish) German Interlanguage [A]. In Teun Hoekstra and Bonnie D. Schwartz (eds), Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar [C]. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 317-368.
Schwartz, B. D. & Sprouse, R. A. 1996. L2 Cognitive States and the Full Transfer/Full Access Model [J]. Second Language Research 12:40-72.
Tsimpli, I. M. & Roussou, A. 1991. Parameter-Resetting in L2? [J]. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 3:149-170.
Yip, V. & Tang, G. 1998. Acquisition of English reflexive binding by Cantonese Learners: Testing the Positive Transfer Hypothesis [A]. In M. L. Beck (Ed.), Morphology and its Interfaces in Second Language Knowledge [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 165-193.
Yuan, B. 1997. Asymmetry of Null Subjects and Null Objects in Chinese Speakers’ L2 English [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19:467-497.
link: