Qassim University, Saudi Arabia
Vol.6 No.1 (Serial No.8) 2018
77-95
2018-06-30
In this paper, I discuss the basic structure of the determiner phrase in Standard Arabic. I show that this phrase houses three different categories that can project distinct functional heads beside the noun. These categories include: DP, GenP, and NumP. I argue that the noun undergoes cyclic movement to the left of GenP and NumP in order to check its unvalued features. The long-distance probe-goal relation cannot be established in this context due to intervention effects raised by the functional heads. However, the definiteness feature on the DP is valued in-situ, without resorting to movement, hence the appearance of this marker is a prefix on the noun. Thus, a new analysis of the determiner phrase in SA is proposed in terms of cyclic movement and probe-goal relation, where both operations are triggered by unvalued features on the noun. The new analysis can successfully account for the different features on the noun as well as the split of morphological markers on the noun as prefixes and suffixes. I claim that structural nominative/accusative Case on the head noun in the Arabic DP is licensed by higher functional heads, i.e. v and T. However, I argue that the genitive construction in Standard Arabic is mediated by a Poss head that has unvalued features and can license Case. The genitive Case on the complement noun is assigned by the Poss head as a reflex of establishing a probe-goal relation. The proposed position for the Poss head accounts for the inexplicable absence of the definiteness marker on the head noun, as well as the Case morphology mismatch between the head noun and the genitive complement.
definiteness, genitive Case, determiner phrase, number features, gender features
doi: 10.26478/ja2018.6.8.5
Abney, S. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its sentential aspect [D]. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Baker, M. 1988. Incorporation [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Belletti, A. & Rizzi, L. (eds). 1996. Parameters and functional heads: essays in comparative syntax [C]. New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
Bittner, M. & Hale, K. 1996. The structural determination of case and agreement [J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 27(1): 1-68.
Carstens, V. 2000. Concord in minimalist theory [J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 31(2): 319-355.
Carstens, V. 2001. Multiple agreement and case deletion: against phi-(in)completeness [J]. Syntax, 4(3): 147-163.
Chomsky, N. 2001. Derivation by phase [A]. In M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language [C]. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1-52.
Fassi Fehri, A. 1993. Issues in the structure of Arabic clauses and words [M]. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Fassi Fehri, A. 1999. Arabic modifying adjectives and DP structures [J]. Studia Linguistica, 53(2): 105-154.
Grimshaw, J. 1990. Argument structure [M]. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
Grimshaw, J. 1991. Extended projection [A]. In P. Coopmans, M. Everaert & J. Grimshaw (eds), Lexical specification and insertion [C]. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics, 115-134.
Grimshaw, J. 1998. Locality and extended projection [M]. Manuscript, Rutgers University.
Halle, M. & Marantz, A. 1993. Distributed morphology [A]. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (eds), The view from building 20: essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger [C]. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press, 111-176.
Jelinek, E. 1984. Case and congurationality [J]. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 2: 39-76.
Kremers, J. 2003. The Arabic noun phrase: a minimalist approach [D]. PhD dissertation, University of Nijmegen.
Longobardi, G. 1994. Reference and proper names: a theory of N-movement in syntax and Logical Form [J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 25(4): 609-665.
Longobardi, G. 1995. A case of construct state in Romance [A]. In R. Ajello & S. Sani (eds). 1995. Scritti linguistici in onore di Tristano Bolelli [C]. Pisa: Pacini, 293-329.
Reuland, E. 1990. Head movement and the relation between syntax and morphology [A]. In G. Booij & J. van Marie, (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 3 [C]. Dordrecht: Foris, 129-161.
Ritter, E. 1991. Two functional categories in noun phrases: evidence from Modern Hebrew [A]. In S. D. Rothstein (ed.), Perspectives on phrase structure: heads and licensing [C]. San Diego: Academic Press, 37-62.
Ritter, E. 1993. Where's gender? [J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 24: 795-803.
Siloni, T. 1997. Noun Phrases and nominalizations: the syntax of DP, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Szabolcsi, A. 1983. The possessor that ran away from home [J]. The Linguistic Review, 1: 89-102.
Szabolcsi, A. 1987. Functional categories in the noun phrase [A]. In Kenesei, István (ed.), Approaches to Hungarian [C]. Szeged: Jate, 167-189.
Szabolcsi, A. 1994. The noun phrase [A]. In F. Kiefer & K. Kiss (eds), The syntactic structure of Hungarian [C]. San Diego: Academic Press, 197-174.
Szabolcsi, A. 1997. Strategies for scope taking [A]. In A. Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of scope taking [C]. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 109-155.
Wright, W. 1981. A Grammar of the Arabic Language [M]. Beirut: Librairie du Liban.
link: