The Non-absoluteness of the Leading Position of the Frequency

发布者:唐美发布时间:2020-02-24浏览次数:94

Author:

Ma Qinghua

Download

Work Unit:

Nanjing University, China

Issue:

Vol.5 No.1 (Serial No.6) 2017

Page:

107-121

Date:

2017-06-01

Abstract:

The design criteria of the vocabulary outline of the second language teaching vary according to the teaching objectives. Under the same objective, the criteria are often more than one. The multiple criteria are sometimes compatible and sometimes conflicting. Through analyzing and evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of the new Chinese Proficiency Test (HSK) Vocabulary Outline, this paper reveals the interactions between the task objectives, the criterion conditions and processing strategies, as well as the interaction relationships between the multiple criteria features of the vocabulary outline designing process, and then abstracts the general principles and overall rules. The research results subvert the habitual knowledge that the frequency criterion position ranked first, which is always popular at least in the Chinese academic circle. It finds that the leading position of frequency criterion only exists in the criteria compatibility model. In the conflict model of the locutionary criteria, the stylistic criterion and syntactic criterion are strong criteria, while the word frequency criterion relegates to the weak position. In the conflict model of the locutionary and illocutionary criteria, the illocutionary criterion is strong criterion, while the locutionary criterion relegates to the weak position, which indicates that the language can’t be above its purpose of usage. This research is conducive to the improvement of the vocabulary outline. It also has certain practical significance to the disciplinary theories of Teaching Chinese to Speakers of Other Language or even to the whole second language teaching.

Key Words:

vocabulary outline, design criteria, compatibility, conflicts, dynamic action principle, optimization

DOI:

doi:10.26478/ja2017.5.6.6

References:

陈满华.1995.俞敏语言学论著的语言风格[J].修辞学习,4:18-19.

国家汉办孔子学院总部.2010.新汉语水平考试大纲[M].北京:商务印书馆.

拉波夫,W.1979.在社会环境里研究语言[A].中译,语言学译丛(第一辑)[C].北京:中国社会科学出版社.

李清华.1999.《汉语水平词汇与汉字等级大纲》的词汇量问题[J].语言教学与研究,1:50-59.

刘长征.2007.《词汇大纲》与2005媒体高频词语比较研究[J].云南师范大学学报(对外汉语教研版),3:14-19.

马清华.2000.文化语义学[M].南昌:江西人民出版社.

______.2008.唯频率标准的不自足性——论面向汉语国际教育的词汇大纲设计标准[J].世界汉语教学,2:119-134.

______.2010.汉语水平考试HSK词汇分类手册[M].北京:商务印书馆.

现代汉语常用词表课题组.2008.现代汉语常用词表(草案)[M].北京:商务印书馆.

张凯.1997.汉语构词基本字的统计分析[J].语言教学与研究,1:43-52.

赵金铭张博程娟.2003.关于修订《(汉语水平)词汇等级大纲》的若干意见[J].世界汉语教学,3:73-83.

中华人民共和国教育部国家语言文字工作委员会.2002.第一批异形词整理表[S].

中国版协校对研究委员会中国语文报刊协会国家语委异形词研究课题组等.2003.第二批异形词(264)整理表(草案)[S].


  • Macrolinguistics(ISSN 1934-5755,e-ISSN 2473-6376)is an international academic journal w...
  • 1. Authors should submit the original work. This journal uses iThentic...
  • 1. Peer review of this journal consists of three procedures in sequence: initial review ...
  • The Learned Press, 9 East 37th Street, Suite: WL, New York, NY 10016, U.S.APhone: 646-831-8213Fa...

link: