The Structure and Hierarchy of Sentence-endings in Tibetan Language

发布者：唐美发布时间：2020-12-30浏览次数：140

Author:

Li Huaping

Download

Work Unit:

Yangtze University, China

Issue:

Vol.8 No.2 (Serial No.13) 2020

Page:

28-43

Date:

2020-12-30

Abstract:

This paper discusses the structure and hierarchy of sentence-endings in Tibetan language. Tibetan sentence-endings are hierarchical. They can be divided into two levels from the perspectives of structure, distribution and expressive function. The first level comes after the predicate or verb phrase, indicating the category of tense/aspect/mood (TAM). The second level, which follows a self-sufficient sentence, mainly expresses the meaning of the speaker’s hint, inference, evaluation and attitude to the information. Each level includes several different types of endings, which act on different syntactic categories or manifest different degrees of subjectivity. The lower the degree of correlation between the endings and the information of the self-sufficient sentence is, the higher the corresponding semantic category and the speaker’s subjective participation are. Some lower-level endings can also express the grammatical meaning of the higher level in certain context with increasing subjectivity.

Key Words:

Tibetan sentence-endings, syntactic hierarchy, sentence-completion category, pragmatic category, subjectivity, syntactic sentence, pragmatic sentence

DOI:

doi: 10.26478/ja2020.8.13.2

References:

Aikhenvald, A. 2004. Evidentiality [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aikhenvald, A. 2012. The Essence of Mirativity [J]. Linguistic Typology, 16(3):435-485.
Delancey, S. 1990. Ergativity and the Cognitive Model of Event Structure in Lhasa Tibetan [J]. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(3):289-321.
Delancey, S. 1991. The Origins of Verb Serialization in Modern Tibetan [J]. Studies in Language, 15(1):1-23.
Delancey, S. 1997. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information [J]. Linguistic Typology, 1(1):33–52.
Delancey, S. 2011. Finite Structures from Clausal Nominalization in Tibeto-Burman [J]. Nominalization in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological 
  perspectives, 1:343-360.
Delancey, S. 2018. Evidentiality in Tibetic [A]. In A. Aikhenvald (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality [C]. New York: Oxford University Press, 580-594.
Denwood, P. 1999. Tibetan [M]. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamin’s Publishing Company.
Hu Tan, et al. 1999. Primer of Lhasa Tibetan [M]. Beijing: Nationalities Press.
Hu Tan. 2002. Studies on Tibetan Language [M]. Beijing: China Tibetology Press. 
Jiang Di. 2005. Aspect, Evidentiality and Egocentricity in Lhasa Tibetan [J]. Linguistic Science, 4(1):70-88.
Jin Peng. 1979. On the Relationship Between the Grammatical Structure and the Characteristics of Tibetan Spoken Verbs in Lhasa [J]. Minority Languages of 
  China, 3:173-181.
Jin Peng. 2001. Tenses and Expressions of Modern Colloquial Verbs in Tibetan [A]. In Jin Peng. Collection of Ethnic [C]. Beijing: National Press, 253-300. 
Li Linding. 1990. Overview of Verb Classification Research [J]. Chinese Language, 4:248-257. 
Lim, J. 2012. The Verb System of Standard Tibetan [OL]. Download website: https://www.academia.edu/4661633/2012_COMPII_Verb_of_Lhasa_Tibetan.
Lü Shuxiang. 1979. Analysis of Chinese Grammar [M]. Beijing: Commercial Press.
Oisel, G. 2017. Re-evaluation of the Evidential System of Lhasa Tibetan and its Atypical Functions [J]. Himalayan Linguistics, 16(2):90-128.
Skalbzang vgyurmed. 2004. A Course in Practical Tibetan Grammar [M]. Chengdu: Sichuan Publishing Group, Sichuan Nationalities Publishing House.
Tournadre, N. & R. J. Lapolla. 2014. Towards a new approach to evidentiality: Issues and directions for research [J]. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 
  37(2):240-262.
Tournadre, N. & Sangda Dorje. 2003. Manual of Standard Tibetan: Language and civilization [M]. New York: Snow Lion Publications, Ithaca.
Van Valin, R. & R. J. Lapolla. 2002. Syntax: structure, meaning, and function [M]. Beijing: Peking University Press.
Zhang Lifei. 2012. The Cognitive Interpretation of Sentence Hierarchy [J]. Foreign Languages Research, 1: 64-68. 
Zhou Jiwen & Xie Houfang. 2003. Grammar of Tibetan Lhasa Dialect [M]. Beijing: Nationalities Press.
PDF下载

Publishing notice

Call for papers

  • Macrolinguistics(ISSN 1934-5755，e-ISSN 2473-6376)is an international academic journal w...

Publication Ethics

  • 1. Authors should submit the original work. This journal uses iThentic...

Peer Review Process

  • 1. Peer review of this journal consists of three procedures in sequence: initial review ...

Publisher

  • The Learned Press, 9 East 37th Street, Suite: WL, New York, NY 10016, U.S.APhone: 646-831-8213Fa...

link: