Kisii University, Kenya; Kisii University, Kenya
Vol.7 No.2 (Serial No.11) 2019
92-109
2019-12-31
This study describes the vowel system of EkeGusii (“Bantu E.42”)(Guthrie, 1948) in an acoustic phonetics perspective using oral data got from purposively sampled subjects: four adult males, four adult females and four children (two boys and two girls all 8 years old) equally from the two dialects of EkeGusii (EkeMaate and EkeRogoro Dialects). In order to capture the distribution characteristics of the vowel acoustic concentration, the group frequency means are normalized using Lobanov’s (1971) algorithm. Two view- points are the subjects of analysis in EkeGusii vowels: (a) acoustic vowel space as projected by the intersection of F2 vs. F1 or quadrilateral, and (b) spatial features of high, low, front and back. These qualities are mainly influenced by the physiology of speakers and social variability as occasioned by gender, age and dialect. The results indicate that children have no gender difference in formants, and have the highest frequencies for all formants, followed by adult females and then adult males. Furthermore, acoustic vowel space and spatial features are affected by gender, age, and dialect. A vowel pattern, replicated by all informants, is realized in the dispersion of the vowels within the chart influenced by gender and age. This study found out that EkeGusii seems to adopt a seven-vowel system of /i e ɛ a ɔ o u/ with a length contrast.
acoustic analysis, EkeGusii, formant peak, vowel chart, vowel system
doi: 10.26478/ja2019.7.11.5
Adank, P. M. 2003. Vowel Normalization: A perceptual acoustic study of Dutch vowels [M]. Wageningen: Ponsen and Looijen.
Basweti, N. O., D. Barasa& N. J. Michira. 2015. Ekegusii DP and its Sentential Symmetry: A minimalist inquiry [J]. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(2).
Boersma, S. E. & D. Weenink. 2010. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [OL]. Version 5.1.43 Retrieved December 18, 2016.
Cammenga, J. 2002. Phonology and Morphology of Ekegusii: A Bantu Language of Kenya [M]. Koln: Rudiger Koppe Verlag.
Fant, G. 1959. Acoustic Analysis and Synthesis of Speech with Application to Swedish [J].Ericson Technics,15: 3-108.
Fant, G. 1960. The Acoustic Theory of Speech Production [M]. The Hague: Mouton.
Guthrie, M. 1948. The Classification of Bantu Languages [M]. London: International African Institute.
Hayward, K. 2013. Experimental Phonetics: An Introduction [M]. New York: Routledge.
Klecka, W. R. 1980. Discriminant Analysis [M]. Newbury Park/London:Sage Publications, Inc.
Ladefoged, P. & F. S. Disner. 2012. Vowels and Consonants [M]. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Ladefoged, P. 2003. Phonetic Data Analysis: An introduction to fieldwork and instrumental techniques [M]. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Lobanov, B. 1971. Classification of Russian Vowels Spoken by Different Speakers [J].JASA, 49(2B): 606-608.
Nash, C. M. 2011. Tone in EkeGusii: A description of nominal and verbal tonology [D]. Ph.D Dissertation, Universityof California.
Nearey, M. T. 1978. Phonetic Features for Vowels [D]. Ph.D Dissertation, University of Alberta.
Nurse, D. & P. Gerard. 2003. The Bantu Languages [M]. London/New York: Routledge.
Ochieng’, W. R. 1974. A Pre–colonial History of the Gusii of Western Kenya CAD 1500–1914 [M]. Nairobi: East African Literature Bureau.
Otieno, P. N. 2013. Specific Language Impairment in the Speech of Meshack, an EkeGusii Speaker [J]. The University of Nairobi Journal of Language and Linguistics, 3:89-107.
Peterson, G.1961. Parameters of Vowel Quality [J]. JSHR, 4(1):10-29.
Stevens, K. 2000. Acoustic Phonetics [M]. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Whitely, W. H. 1956. A Practical Introduction to Gusii [M]. Nairobi: East African Literature Bureau.
link: