Comparative Analysis of Amharic and Afaan Oromoo Proverbs: A meta-communication perspective

发布者:唐美发布时间:2019-12-31浏览次数:103

Author:

Abebe Lemessa Saka, Eba Teresa Garoma

Download

Work Unit:

Haramya University, Ethiopia; Jimma University, Ethiopia

Issue:

Vol.7 No.2 (Serial No.11) 2019

Page:

72-91

Date:

2019-12-31

Abstract:

Proverbs are timeless human wisdom in the form of concise figurative speech. They reflect the conceptual experience of the speakers, particularly the elders in speech communities. This study aims at presenting a comparative study between Amharic and Afaan Oromoo proverbs from the standpoint of meta-communication perspective. Meta-communication is conceptualized as communicating about communication. Communication is believed to have many things in common with culture in that it shapes and dictates the communication behavior of a given society. In verbal communication, the use of proverbs is quite often, explicitly to comment on communication behavior. Despite the multifaceted functions of proverbs in several disciplines, the focuses of this study are proverbs as sources of communication that are relevant in linguistics and anthropology. In so doing, sample proverbs have been purposively selected based on semantic criteria and analyzed by using psycho-analysis method. In the analysis of the proverbs, we built a cognitive model for their semantic relationships. This is because the proverbs have relatively stable, conventionalized and contextual meaning of form as continuum, residing in their common conceptual base. Above of all, they are metaphor-dependent as a common on conceptual base. Hence, there are a number of proverbs in Amharic and Afaan Oromoo as well that comment on importance of communication, communication behavior or processes, among others. In both ethno-linguistic groups, thus, employing such proverbs to comment on communication is quite common which tend to show the communication behavior of each group.

Key Words:

Afaan Oromoo, Amharic, meta-communication, metaphor, proverbs

DOI:

doi: 10.26478/ja2019.7.11.4

References:

Berhanu, G. T. 2002. Amharic Proverbs and Their Meanings [M]. Addis Ababaː Addis Ababa University Press.

Bynum, J. 1987. Proverbs [J]. ETC: A review of general semantics, 44(1):88-91.

Calhoun, C. (ed). 2002. Dictionary of Social Sciences [M]. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

Dodd, H. 1979. Dynamics of Intercultural Communication [M]. 4th edn. London: Brown and Benchmark.

Eggins, S. & D. Slade. 1997. Analyzing Casual Conversation [M]. London: Equinox.

Finnegan, R. 1976. Oral Literature in Africa [M]. Nairobi: Oxford University Press.

Gudykunst, W., M. Yuko, T. Stella, N. Tsukasa, K. Kwangsu & H. Sam. 1996. The Influence of Cultural Individualism – Collectivism, self construals and individual values on communication styles across cultures [J]. Human Communication Research, 22(4):510-543.

Hamdesa, T. 1982. ‘Minority’ Education in Ethiopia [J]. Africa, 37(3):270-293.

Hasan-Rokem, G. 1992. Proverb in Folklore Cultural Performance and Popular Entertainment [M]. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

Kottak, C. P. 2003. Cultural Anthropology [M]. Boston: McGraw Hill.

Levne, D. 2000. Greater Ethiopia. The Revolution of Multicultural Society [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Mac Coinnigh, M. 2015. Structural Aspects of Proverbs [A]. In H. Hrisztova-Gotthardt & M. A. Varga (eds.), Introduction to Paremiology: A comprehensive guide to proverb studies [C]. Berlin: de Gruyter. 112-132

Melowsky, F. 1978. Escaping A Double Bind: Effects of locus of control and double bind information [M]. Texas: PhD Dissertation of Texas Tech University.

Miruka, O. 1994. Understanding and Teaching Proverbs [A]. In A. Bukenya, W. Kabira and O. Okombo (eds.), Understanding Oral Literature [C]. Nairobi: Nairobi University Press. 36-78.

Okpewho, I. 1992. African Oral Literature: Backgrounds, characters and continuity [M]. Indiana: Bloomington and Indianapolis.

Olson, D. & J. DeFrain. 2000. Marriage and the Family: Diversity and strengths [M]. 3rd edn. London, Toronto: Mayfield Publishing Company.

Rescher, N. 1998. The Significance of Silence [J]. European Review, 6(1):91-95.

Rothwell, J. 2000. In the Company of Others: An introduction to communication [M]. Mountain View: Mayfield Publishing Company.

Schoop, M. & Q. Christoph. 2000. Perspective on Communication Modeling [A]. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on the Language-Action [C]. Aachen: Kongressband.

Scupin, R. & C. Decorse. 2004. Anthropology: A global perspective [M]. 5th edn. New Delhi: Prentice-Hail, Inc.

Wasane, B. 2016. Leftover Bowl [M]. 10th edn. Addis Ababa/Finfinneeː Nech-Sar Printing.

Wilmot, W. 1980. Metacommunication: A re-examination and extension [J]. Annals of the International Communication Association, 4(1):61-69.

Yankah, K. 1989. Proverbs: The aesthetics of traditional communication [J]. Research in African Literatures, 20(3):325-346.

Yankah, K. 1994. Proverbs [A]. In R. Asher (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics [C].Vol. 6. Oxford: Pergamon Press. 3374-3397.

Yetim, F. 2004. A Meta-Communication Model for Reflective Practitioners [OL]. Retrieved on 07 March 2019 from http://www.ics.uci.edu/~redmiles/chiworkshop/papers/Yetim.pdf.

Zuo, Y. 2002. The Golden Silence: A pragmatic study on silence in dyadic english conversation [M]. Munchen: Lincom Europa.



  • Macrolinguistics(ISSN 1934-5755,e-ISSN 2473-6376)is an international academic journal w...
  • 1. Authors should submit the original work. This journal uses iThentic...
  • 1. Peer review of this journal consists of three procedures in sequence: initial review ...
  • The Learned Press, 9 East 37th Street, Suite: WL, New York, NY 10016, U.S.APhone: 646-831-8213Fa...

link: